Processing math: 7%

Isomorphisms among semidirect products by a cyclic group

Posted on 2010-06-25 by nbloomf
Tags: cyclic-group, isomorphism, semidirect-product, d-and-f

Let K be a cyclic group, H an arbitrary group, and α and β homomorphisms KAut(H). If K is infinite, suppose further that α and β are injective.

Show that if im α and im β are conjugate subgroups in Aut(H), then H


Let x be a generator of K and say that \sigma conjugates \mathsf{im}\ \alpha into \mathsf{im}\ \beta; that is, that \sigma\left(\mathsf{im}\ \alpha\right)\sigma^{-1} = \mathsf{im}\ \beta.

In particular, \sigma \alpha(x) \sigma^{-1} \in \mathsf{im}\ \beta, so that \sigma \alpha(x) \sigma^{-1} = \beta(x^a) for some (not necessarily unique!) x^a \in K. Now if x^b is any element of K, we have \sigma \alpha(x^b) \sigma^{-1} = \sigma \alpha(x)^b \sigma^{-1} = \left(\sigma \alpha(x) \sigma^{-1}\right)^b = \beta(x)^{ab} = \beta(x^b)^a. In particular, for all k \in K we have \sigma \alpha(k) = \beta(k)^a \sigma.

Now define a mapping \psi : H \rtimes_{\alpha} K \rightarrow H \rtimes_{\beta} K by \psi(h,k) = (\sigma(h), k^a). We claim that \psi is a group homomorphism.

To see this, let (h_1,k_1), (h_2,k_2) \in H \rtimes_{\varphi\_1} K. We have \begin{array}{rcl} \psi\left((h_1,k_1) \cdot (h_2,k_2)\right) & = & \psi\left(h_1 \alpha(k_1)(h_2), k_1k_2\right) \\ & = & \left(\sigma(h_1 \alpha(k_1)(h_2)), (k_1k_2)^a\right) \\ & = & \left(\sigma(h_1) \sigma(\alpha(k_1)(h_2)), k_1^a k_2^a\right) \\ & = & \left(\sigma(h_1) (\sigma \circ \alpha(k_1))(h_2), k_1^a k_2^a\right) \\ & = & \left(\sigma(h_1) (\beta(k_1)^a \sigma)(h_2), k_1^a k_2^a\right) \\ & = & \left(\sigma(h_1) \beta(k_1^a)(\sigma(h_2)), k_1^a k_2^a\right) \\ & = & \left(\sigma(h_1), k_1^a)(\sigma(h_2), k_ 2^a\right) \\ & = & \psi(h_1,k_1) \cdot \psi(h_2,k_2), \\ \end{array} and thus \psi is a homomorphism.

We now show that \psi is bijective.

First suppose K is infinite, so that (by hypothesis) both \alpha and \beta are injective. Just as \sigma \alpha(k) = \beta(k)^a \sigma for all k \in K, there is an integer b such that \beta(k) \sigma = \sigma \alpha(k)^b for all k \in K. Combining these results we see that \beta(k) = \beta(k^{ab}). Since \beta is injective we have k^{1-ab} = 1, and since K is infinite and k arbitrary, we have ab = 1. Thus a = b \in \{1,-1\}; in either case we have a^2 = 1.

Define a mapping \chi : H \rtimes_{\beta} K \rightarrow H \rtimes_{\alpha} K by \chi(h,k) = \left(\sigma^{-1}(h), k^a\right). Then (\chi \circ \psi)(h,k) = \chi(\psi(h,k)) = \chi(\sigma(h), k^a) = ((\sigma^{-1}\sigma)(h), k^{aa}) = (h,k), so that \chi \circ \psi = 1. Similarly \psi \circ \chi = 1. Thus \psi is bijective and we have H \rtimes_{\beta} K \cong H \rtimes_{\alpha} K.

Before proceeding to the finite case we prove the following lemma, due to Luís Finotti.

Let a, m, and n be integers such that m \mid n and \mathsf{gcd}(a,m) = 1. Then there is an integer \overline{a} such that \overline{a} \equiv a \pmod{m} and \mathsf{gcd}(\overline{a},n) = 1.

Let d = \mathsf{gcd}(a,n) and write n = mq. Note that \mathsf{gcd}(d,m) = 1 since d divides a, so that d \mid q by Euclid’s Lemma. Write a = a^\prime d and q = q^\prime d, and let t be the (possibly empty) product of all prime divisors of q^\prime which do not divide d. Finally, let \overline{a} = a + tm. Certainly \overline{a} \equiv a \pmod{m}.

Suppose p is a prime divisor of n. We claim that p does not divide \overline{a}; to show this we consider three possibilities.

  1. If p \mid m, then p \not\mid a since a and m are relatively prime. Thus p cannot divide a + tm = \overline{a}.
  2. If p \not\mid m and p \mid q^\prime, we have two cases.
    1. If p \mid d, then p \mid a. We also have p \not\mid t by construction, so that p \not\mid tm. Thus p cannot divide a + tm = \overline{a}.
    2. If p \not\mid d, then p \mid t by construction. Note also that p \not\mid a, since otherwise p divides both a and n and so must divide d. Thus p cannot divide a + tm = \overline{a}.
  3. If p \not\mid m and p \not\mid q^\prime, then since n = m q^\prime d we have that p \mid d and thus p \mid a. Now p \not\mid t by construction, so that p \not\mid tm. Thus p cannot divide a + tm = \overline{a}.

Since no prime divisor of n divides \overline{a} we have \mathsf{gcd}(\overline{a},n) = 1.

Now to the main result.

Suppose K \cong Z_n is finite. Note that \mathsf{im}\ \alpha is cyclic of order m for some m \mid n by Lagrange’s Theorem. Since x generates K, \alpha(x) generates \mathsf{im}\ \alpha, and since conjugation by \sigma is an isomorphism \mathsf{im}\ \alpha \rightarrow \mathsf{im}\ \beta, we have that \sigma\alpha(x)\sigma^{-1} = \beta(x)^a generates \mathsf{im}\ \beta. Thus \mathsf{gcd}(a,m) = 1. By the lemma, there exists \overline{a} such that \overline{a} \equiv a \pmod{m} and \mathsf{gcd}(\overline{a},n) = 1. Moreover, there exists b such that \overline{a}b \equiv 1 \pmod{n}.

Define a map \chi : H \rtimes_{\beta} K \rightarrow H \rtimes_{\alpha} K by \chi(h,k) = (\sigma^{-1}(h), k^b). It is straightforward to check that this map is a two-sided inverse of \psi; hence H \rtimes_{\beta} K \cong H \rtimes_{\alpha} K.